English 
Spanish 
German 
French 
Russian 
Korean 
Arabic 
Indonesian 
Japanese 
Turkish 
Portuguese 
Greek 
Dutch 
As automation systems expand globally, energy costs become a critical pain point. Many engineers debate: cable trolleys or drag chains? Let’s cut through the noise with real-world data.
Drag chains typically consume 15-30% less energy than cable trolleys due to reduced friction and optimized motion paths. But specific applications may alter this advantage.
Last year, a U.S.-based client, Marco (automation equipment assembler), switched from cable trolleys to our plastic drag chains. His energy bills dropped 22% in 3 months. Let’s explore why.
[Table of contents]
How Do Drag Chains Minimize Energy Waste in Motion?
Friction is the silent killer of energy efficiency. Drag chains use enclosed tracks and low-resistance materials to reduce mechanical wear.
The modular design of drag chains (like DOWE’s nylon-based energy chains1) creates smooth, predictable motion paths, minimizing abrupt directional changes that waste energy.
Material Choices Directly Impact Energy Loss
| Material | Friction Coefficient | Ideal Speed Range |
|---|---|---|
| Steel | 0.5–0.8 | Low to medium |
| Nylon | 0.2–0.4 | Medium to high |
| Hybrid polymer | 0.3–0.6 | Variable |
For high-speed setups, our clients prefer nylon-based chains. A German automotive plant cut energy use by 18% after adopting DOWE’s flexible cable tracks for robotic arms.
Are Cable Trolleys More Energy-Intensive in Long-Distance Setups?
Cable trolleys excel in straight-line layouts but struggle with complex paths. Their open design increases air resistance and requires more frequent acceleration/deceleration.
In setups exceeding 10 meters, cable trolleys often demand 30% higher motor power to maintain speed due to inertia and alignment challenges.
Case Study: Packaging Line Retrofit
A Spanish client (Pablo, 42) replaced 15-meter cable trolleys with our steel drag chains:
- Energy consumption dropped from 7.2 kW to 5.1 kW daily
- Maintenance costs fell 40% (no more misaligned rollers)
“The ROI was clear within 6 months,” Pablo told us.
Can Drag Chains Adapt to High-Speed Automation Without Energy Spikes?
Speed amplifies energy inefficiencies. Drag chains face skepticism here, but modern designs defy this.
Our crane cable carriers with guided rollers handle speeds up to 5 m/s while keeping energy fluctuations below 12%—critical for precision robotics.
3 Factors That Prevent Energy Surges:
- Weight distribution: Centralized cable placement avoids pendulum effects.
- Lubrication intervals: Self-lubricating materials (e.g., IGUS-inspired tech) reduce upkeep.
- Customization: For a French aerospace client, we developed tapered chain links to cut air resistance by 27%.
Conclusion
Drag chains generally save more energy than cable trolleys, but context matters. For heavy loads/simple paths, hybrid solutions may win. Want a free energy audit for your setup?
-
Learn how drag chains reduce friction and optimize motion paths for energy savings. ↩